- view: text
- select for diffs
- revision graph
Sun Dec 8 12:41:20 2002 UTC
(17 years, 4 months ago) by mpeseng
CVS tags: HEAD
2002-12-08 Marco Pesenti Gritti <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Make it pass distcheck.
* src/ephy-tab.c: (ephy_tab_dom_mouse_down_cb):
Reintroduce page load on url pasting.
1: Epiphany is a GNOME web browser based on the mozilla
2: rendering engine.
3: The name meaning:
4: "An intuitive grasp of reality through
5: something (as an event) usually simple and striking"
9: A web browser is more than an application, it is a way of thinking, it is
10: a way of seeing the world. Epiphany's principles are simplicity and standards
15: While Mozilla has an excellent rendering engine, its default
16: XUL-based interface is considered to be overcrowded and bloated. Furthermore,
17: on slower processors even trivial tasks such as pulling down a menu is less
18: than responsive.
20: Epiphany aims to utilize the simplest interface possible for a browser. Keep
21: in mind that simple does not necessarily mean less powerful. We believe
22: the commonly used browsers of today are too big, buggy, and bloated. Epiphany
23: addresses simplicity with a small browser designed for the web -- not mail,
24: newsgroups, file management, instant messenging or coffee making. The UNIX
25: philosophy is to design small tools that do one thing, and do it well.
27: Epiphany also address simplicity with modularity to make a light and powerful
28: application. If something can be implemented using external applications
29: or components, we use it rather than wasting resources in the web browser.
30: Integration will be achived with CORBA, Bonobo, and the ever popular
31: command line.
33: Mail will be handled with your favorite e-mail application (Evolution, pine,
34: mutt, balsa, pronto, whatever).
36: Standards compliance:
38: The introduction of non-standard features in browsers could make it difficult
39: or impossible to use alternative products like Epiphany if developers embrace
40: them. Alternative (standards complying) browsers could not be able to
41: fully access web sites making use of these features. The success of
42: non-standard features can ultimately lead to forcing one browser, on
43: one platform to dominate the market.
45: Standards compliance ensures the freedom of choice. Epiphany aims to achieve
48: USER INTERFACE LINES
50: - HIG compliance
52: Epiphany is going to follow version 1.0 of the gnome
53: user guidelines. Unless there are very seriuos reasons to make an
54: exception not following it will be considered a bug.
55: "I follow the HIG only when I like it" is not a legitimate approach.
56: Any areas where we diverge from the HIG will communicated
57: to the HIG team for future consideration.
59: - Gnome integration
61: Epiphany's main goal is to be integrated with the gnome desktop.
62: We dont aim to make epiphany usable outside Gnome. If someone will like
63: to use it anyway, it's just a plus. Ex: Making people happy that
64: don't have control center installed is not a good reason
65: to have mime configuration in epiphany itself.
67: - Simple design
69: Feature bloat and user interface clutter is evil :)
71: - Preferences
73: We will follow the new gnome policy about preferences.
74: I think Havoc Pennington already explained it a lot
75: better than I could ever do.
78: - User target
80: We target non-technical users by design.
81: This happens to be 90% of the user population.
82: (Technical details should not exposed in the interface)
83: We target web users, we dont directly target web developers.
84: A few geek-oriented feautures can be kept as
85: long as they are non-obtrusive.
89: You will need a complete installation of Gnome 2.2 desktop.
90: Mozilla API is not stable. I'll be keeping in sync epiphany cvs
91: head with mozilla cvs head.
92: The required mozilla version will be specified in the
93: release notes.
95: HOW TO HELP
97: You can report new bugs on http://epiphany.mozdev.org/bugs.html.
98: Feel free to send patches.
100: About new feautures I'll just quote Metacity FAQ.
102: Q: Will you add my feature?
104: A: If it makes sense to turn on unconditionally,
105: or is genuinely a harmless preference that I would not
106: be embarrassed to put in a simple, uncluttered, user-friendly
107: configuration dialog.
109: If the only rationale for your feature is that other
110: [browsers] have it, or that you are personally used to it, or something
111: like that, then I will not be impressed. [Epiphany] is firmly in the
112: "choose good defaults" camp rather than the "offer 6 equally broken
113: ways to do it, and let the user pick one" camp.
115: Don't let this discourage patches and fixes - I love those. ;-)
116: Just be prepared to hear the above objections if your patch
117: adds some crack-ridden configuration option.
121: Marco Pesenti Gritti <email@example.com>